Ask Dr. Finlayson-Fife

Sep 06, 14 Ask Dr. Finlayson-Fife



We will once more be interviewing the amazing and brilliant Dr. Jennifer Finlayson-Fife.  As we mentioned before, Dr. Finlayson-Fife is an intimacy-therapist. And by intimacy we mean sex, but we couldn’t shock our predominately LDS audience in the second sentence, so we waited for the third. If you can think of any other vague euphemisms that would be more clear, feel free to suggest them.

As part of this series, the good Doctor will continue answering any questions our readers/listeners may have, so please feel free to ask! Below you will see the different ways to get a question to Dr. Finlayson-Fife. Please don’t hesitate, all questions will remain anonymous.

Here is how you can ask her a question:
Comment on this post with your name
Comment on this post anonymously
Send a private email to:


Laurel Sandberg-Armstrong

Laurel is an actress and voice-over artist who lives with her husband and toddler in a soon-to-be-lovely little duplex (we're working on it) just outside Minneapolis. Like many Mormons her age, she enjoys stuff and doing things, and hopes that she can get even better at stuff so she can be a professional doer of things. She also thinks she maybe should not have written her bio when she was so tired.

All posts by


  1. You forgot the “sacred powers of procreation”! I’m looking forward to the podcast.

  2. The private email address you gave is bouncing back — even when I delete the spaces! Help?

  3. EOR-Unsigned /

    It is so funny to me when I read or hear people saying that Mormons don’t talk about sex. Mormons are obsessed with sex! It’s actually pretty gross and off-putting how much it is the topic of conversation.

  4. No one /

    Bishopric feedback to what is acceptable in the bedroom has been… As long as you are both comfortable and you aren’t bringing in another person, all is well. Any thoughts? Can that be true? It seems to me that two people may be comfortable doing some things that may not be acceptable.

  5. dallske /

    EOR-Unsigned: Many Mormons like to bring it up in conversation because they are religiously/sexually repressed. Not only Mormons, but conservative Americans in general. So when you hear Mormons “talking” about sex, it is almost equivalent to one testing the waters, seeing if they can bring it up so some progress toward resolution can be made, or at least finding others who struggle with similar bedroom issues.

  6. Carson /

    Eor-unsigned, sex and sugar are the only vices we have as Mormons. We can’t help but over indulge!

    I pay for some awesome couple therapy from Dr Fife which I recommend everyone do no matter how good your marriage is, but I have a general question as a sociology/anthropology hobbyist…

    I often hear how American but especially Mormon sexuality is based in Victorian thought. This is usually stated as if the rest of the world and times throughout history were not so conservative. What are other times and countries like? From what I’ve personally seen around the world in Asia and Argentina everybody else is very similar to us.

  7. Carson /

    I should add similar to us as a country since we’ve stayed as a church where America was in about the fifties

  8. halp /

    Growing up, I wanted to be a YW of virtue. This meant being a guardian of YM virtue. Despite being attractive and feeling like I wanted to develop my burgeoning sexual identity, I controlled and suppressed it. I find the sex-rhetoric in church to be male-centric – a female who has decided not to have pre-marital sex will require maintenance of a pilot light of sexuality through pre-marriage years. For males, this pilot light stays stoked through overt biology and sociocultural factors, for women, the process is more complex, i.e. a woman who suppresses her sexuality successfully in her youth, cannot suddenly construe herself as having a sexual identity, which is, ironically, necessary to fulfill the role of wife and mother, as encouraged by Mormonism. A male (anecdotally speaking) might be more able to suppress sexual behaviours prior to marriage, but is less likely to be inhibited or disinterested in sex once given the greenlight. In other words, Mormonism doesn’t just create low-drive women partners, but sometimes no-drive partners. For me, I didn’t naturally feel like a low-drive partner, but was so successful in being the idea YW, that I have turned into this. I’m unhappy with it and willing to do the ugly work of uprooting my identity to fix this – I will be with my husband forever and am disinterested in taking on a martyr complex (‘I’m a low drive partner because I’m less carnal, more holy!’) to protect myself. The question here is, where do I start? How can you cultivate desire? If I weren’t married, I know precisely how I’d do this, but I’m unable to do those things now I’m married – I think desire helps you cultivate sexuality, but how can I cultivate sexuality via desire if I ‘have’ what I desire?